30
Jun
2005

This week on Morgan Spurlock’s 30 Days, 33 year old David Stacy, a die-hard Christian, moved from his home in West Virgina to Dearborn, MI to live as a Muslim. To give you an idea of his starting point, Morgan asks him what does he think of when he thinks of Muslims, his response is “A guy with an AK-47.” Oh goody.

As one can expect, this plays out as a morality tale of learning to love thy neighbor, no matter what the differences are. It did have some nice primer information about the religion of Islam (explaining how Muslims do recognize Jesus as a prophet, and that they feel they come from the same religious tree as Judaism and Christianity)

As part of the “experiment” (I use the term lightly), David moved in with a Muslim family in Michigan, the Haque family. Shamael is a first year resident, and his wife, Sadia, is going to law school and they have a two year old daughter, Hanaan. Shamael and Sadia are both of Pakistani descent, but were born here in the United States. Overall he got along with the family, and we only saw one instance of him having an argument over terroism with them. It did get heated, but not horribly so.

David is hard pressed to accept all the aspects of the Islamic life, especially the praying. He feels that to do so, would go agianst his God. Up until the very last day, he avoids praying, which is difficult to do since Muslims pray five times a day, the first time each day being at 5:30 AM. When he does finally pray at a large Mosque, he can be seen holding a cross in his right hand, at last he has found a compromise between the two.

There were a lot of things though that David was still having trouble with, and a lot of things that went unexplained. I can only remember seeing him read from the Qur’an (the Islamic holy book) once. Did he read it fully? Did he even try? He did take lessons in Arabic to better understand the praying, but he didn’t begin those lessons until he was two weeks into the process. I was happy to see him go to a Halaal butcher to better understand their diet, and the way their food must be prepared.

The biggest gap though comes at the end of the episode. David is asked to go out and get signatures on a petition to stop the racial profiling of Muslims. He goes out in full Islamic dress, and attempts to collect signatures. We see rejection after rejection, and the inevitable accusations of Muslims being terrorists. He defends the Islamic faith, and says that every religion has their radicals, and that the boming of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City is an example of that. How did David suddnely become a defender of Muslims? Why did he have this seeming change of heart? The episode never showed any “revelation” type moment where he suddenly understand the Muslim faith any better, so why did he feel a sudden need to defend them?

Like I said after the first episode though, this series is facing the problem of being predictible. Did anyone really expect David to walk away from this experiance hating Muslims? I doubt it. There is even an article online now from someone who was approached to represent the Muslims in the episode. The article quotes information that came from Morgan Spurlock’s production company:

“This process aims to deconstruct common misconceptions and stereotypes. . . . Our character will learn firsthand about Islam and the daily issues that . . . Muslims in America face today. The viewers will witness our character emerge from the immersion situation with a deeper understanding and appreciation for the Muslim-American experience. . . . The potential is great for this program to enlighten a national television audience about the Muslim American experience and increase their compassion, understanding and support.”

This episode suffered the worst yet from the 1-hour format. There were so many more things I would have liked to have seen. Don’t get me wrong, the episode probably did it’s job, and if it got through to even one person, fantastic, but I doubt it did. I just didn’t feel anything was explained in enough depth. To much time was spent on “Muslims are terrorists!” “No they’re not!” as opposed to just saying flat out that Qur’an teaches non-violence. Really, it’s that simple, it could have been summed up in a few easy sentances.

29
Jun
2005

It is already well known that I am a reality TV addict, but even the die-hards have their guilty pleasures. Yes folks, there is a reality show that even other reality fanatics look down their nose’s at, and that show is….Big Brother.

Yes, it is true, I am a Big Brother watcher. I was beyond hooked for the first season. The live feeds kept me up well beyond dawn a few times. I skipped Big Brother 2 because I didn’t like the format change, but I cam back for #3, and haven’t left since. While I may think Julie Chen is about the worst host in reality TV history, I’m still there, episode after episode. I watch live feeds…I read live updates at JokersUpdates.com…I am a junky, and I admit it.

So why do I bother posting this? Well, the new season starts next week, the houseguests were announced today, and I just wanted to give everyone fair warning that this was going to be a big part of my blog for awhile.

28
Jun
2005

The Morning after eviction always means a new task to determine a winner for a reward. This week it was learning to make pasta since the service the next night was going to be all pasta dishes. The team to make the most usable pasta, determined by weight, in 20 minutes would win. After the 20 minutes, Gordon went through the pasta, tossed some and weighed some. In a decesion od 2.41 pounds vs 2.45 pounds, the red team won.

While the red team got to leave the kitchen for a gondola ride, with some wine drinking, the blues had to stay in the kitchen to make pasta noodles for the next nights dinner. No surprise, the blues were a bit upset, and a bit whiny about it I must say. You lost, be gracious, don’t whine about it. Weird side note for this section, it seems Michael goes out to the backyard every night and talks to himself outloud. Very odd.

As they prepare for the service, Gordon tells the teams that there will be two service this night. While one team cooks, the other will serve, and during the second service they will reverse. Each service will last two hours, and they are to serve as many tables as possible in that time. Gordon then tells the reds that they get to choose which they will do first, they opt to cook for the first setting of customers.

The reds get a lot of their food out, but as is to be expected, they make a lot of mistakes also. The blues service was ok, though I was bit shocked by Jessica just randomly giving out entrees towards the end of their service.

When the blues took over the kitchen, Michael got the idea to pay attention to what the blues were low on in their prep, and try to get as many people as possible to order that. Lasagana suddenly became a very popular dish in Hell’s Kitchen. Jimmy made a lot of mistakes in serving, and served the wrong table entrees for another table, causing a re-do to happen. Gordon was less than thrilled.

When all was said and done, the reds got more of their orders out, but got worse marks for their food and made numerous mistakes in the serving. Gordon named Michael the banishment namer, and he put up Elsie and Chris. In the end, Chris was sent home.

As a side note, Chris was very proud of the fact he is an executive chef, and he seemed to think this made him and Gordon understand each other. From watching Gordon’s shows in England, Gordon hates executive chefs, and finds them to be useless. For those who don’t know what an EC does….Gordon is correct. They don’t actually cook, they just sit around and tell people what to do, they are management, nothing more.

27
Jun
2005

In a surprising turn of events, Dennis Rader (AKA the BTK Killer) pleaded guilty to 10 counts of murder today. No insanity defense…no blaming his parents…nothing. You can read all the details in this news story.

My opinion? His defense lawyer probably told him he would not take the stand. Dennis obviouslly feeds on attention, hence the letters he wrote while he was killing, and this was the best way to get all eyes on himself. Shock everyone, get to tell your side of the story and get mentioned on every news program and in every printed form of media. And yes, I understand I am feeding his sickness by talking about him, but I am so shocked by this, I couldn’t fight the urge.

26
Jun
2005

Take the MIT Weblog Survey

26
Jun
2005
Written by  |  under Movies, TV  |  No Comments

So…yeah…Tom Cruise. Just a word of advice on your career Tom, when promoting a major Summer blockbuster film, like War Of The Worlds, it is typically a good idea to act…oh…I don’t know….SANE!!!!

Typically I don’t like getting involved in the going-ons in an actor’s life, like anyone, they are entitled to a private life. More power to them. However, when it gets to the point I can’t turn on the TV without someone discussing your…bizarre….actions, I tend to get a bit annoyed. When you go on a morning news/talk show like Today, arguing with the host, in this case Matt Lauer, is usually not a good way to endear yourself to the movie going public. If you haven’t read the transcript, or better yet, watched the video of Tom’s apperance, you should. You can find both of them here. How about some highlights though?

In discussion about Tom Cruise’s recent comments about Brooke Shields, and how she souldn’t take any medication for her postpartum depression:

Cruise: No, you see. Here’s the problem. You don’t know the history of psychiatry. I do.

Lauer: Aren’t there examples, and might not Brooke Shields be an example, of someone who benefited from one of those drugs?

Cruise: All it does is mask the problem, Matt. And if you understand the history of it, it masks the problem. That’s what it does. That’s all it does. You’re not getting to the reason why. There is no such thing as a chemical imbalance.

Lauer: So, postpartum depression to you is kind of a little psychological gobbledygook ?

Wow..no such thing as a chemical imbalance huh? Yep…all those years of research mean nothing. Tom Cruise…actor and medical expert.

Lauer: But a little bit of what you’re saying Tom is, you say you want people to do well. But you want them do to well by taking the road that you approve of, as opposed to a road that may work for them.

Cruise: No, no, I’m not.

Lauer: Well, if antidepressants work for Brooke Shields, why isn’t that okay?

Cruise: I disagree with it. And I think that there’s a higher and better quality of life. And I think that, promoting ? for me personally, see, you’re saying what, I can’t discuss what I wanna discuss?

You can discuss anything you want Tom, but let’s just hope it make some sort of sense. However, where do you get off publically attacking Brooke Shields for something she felt she needed? How would you feel if some other actor came out attacking you for your need to have Scientology in your life? I imagine you probably wouldn’t be too happy about it. (Please note, if you read the Scientology site, you should also really read clambake.org/, which will give you a another view of Scientology. (just trying to be balanced)

Lauer: No. You absolutely can.

Cruise: I know. But Matt, you’re going in and saying that, that I can’t discuss this.

Lauer: I’m only asking, isn’t there a possibility that ? do you examine the possibility that these things do work for some people? That yes, there are abuses. And yes, maybe they’ve gone too far in certain areas. Maybe there are too many kids on Ritalin. Maybe electric shock ?

Cruise: Too many kids on Ritalin? Matt.

Lauer: I’m just saying. But aren’t there examples where it works?

Cruise: Matt. Matt, Matt, you don’t even ? you’re glib. You don’t even know what Ritalin is. If you start talking about chemical imbalance, you have to evaluate and read the research papers on how they came up with these theories, Matt, okay? That’s what I’ve done. Then you go and you say where’s the medical test? Where’s the blood test that says how much Ritalin you’re supposed to get?

Um….maybe in the scientific data that you claim to have read? I don’t know, call me silly if you must, but that’s where I would look first.

You really should just go read the whole thing, it’s amazing. (Plus, if I post much more, I will be going beyond the “fair use” law.)

So what is my point to all this? Lots. I think that our celebrities are growing more and more wildly out of control. Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes pretty much are the current poster children for this. Celebrities have gotten to a point where they feel they can go around saying anything they want without any sort of ramifications.

There a lot of reasons why certain opinions should be kept to yourself if you are in the public eye at all. I am a business owner, and I know some customers might not shop with me if I publically said what political party I belong to. So, to make sure I don’t annoy my customers, I keep my mouth shut about politics. Before Tom goes shooting his mouth off about psychology, he should perhaps ponder what this might do to his career. I, for one, will not be seeing his new film, or any of his future films because he has annoyed me to such an extent. There are also lots of rumors circulating that Katie Holmes probably won’t be invivted back for the Batman Begins follow-up due to her recent actions.

It’s up to each person to decide if this bothers them. Every person in this country has a right to their own opinions and has the right to express them. Each person should also realize though, sometimes it is best to not go on a highly rated morning talk show and essentially call the host a moron. And to attack another celebrity for seeking medical help that you don’t believe in? Or for that matter, basically saying that anyone on these meds is in the wrong? Just not a smart move in my not-so-humble opinion.

(For added fun, read Al Roker’s take on this at his blog, scroll down to June 24th)

25
Jun
2005

Back on June 12th, I made a post about how there seems to be a bias in the media over what sort of missing person stories they focus on. Natalee Holloway is still missing, and we still seem to get hourly updates on her. It seems no one else has gone missing in all this time, except for the three boys in New Jersey, who have now been found, sadly dead of accidental suffication.

So now though, this concept is getting so wildly out of control, even parts of the media are starting to finally pay attention. It’s about time! This article in the Chicago Sun-Times, by Erin Texeira, addresses this very subject. Her first paragraph makes the very point I was trying to make:

“Most of the missing adults tracked by the FBI are men. More than one in five of those abducted or kidnapped are black.”

And how many of those people do we hear about? Pretty much none. Later on, she sites:

Of the nearly 47,600 active adult cases tracked by the FBI as of the beginning of May, 53 percent were men and 29 percent black.

Well golly gee Wally, I must not be watching the news very often since I haven’t heard about any of those.

Do I take a look at the article for a lot more interesting insights, but it is nice to see someone in the media bringing this up!

24
Jun
2005
Written by  |  under General  |  No Comments

So, Tuesday night I was running way late, and threw a Marie Callender Chicken Pot Pie in the oven, after of course preheating to 400 degrees. 45 minutes later my chickeny goodness was ready. I noticed it had broken open in the oven, but, not big deal.

Pot Pie

So grabbing said pot pie, I headed for my usual chair to watch TV and eat. Honestly, I can’t remember what exactly caused me to drop the pie, but I won’t be forgetting it anytime soon.

I am just linking to the picture of the resulting 2nd degree burn. Not horrible, but nor pretty either. Didn’t want to just spring it on anyone. The picture is here, you have been warned.

Like I said, it’s not the most horrible burn ever by any means, but it’s not exactly painless either. Right now it is mostly stiff. I keep covering it in Neosporin, and I guess we will just have to see how it heals up. I think the worst part though is explaining to folks that the horrible burn on your lower leg came from, of all things, a pot pie.

23
Jun
2005

Last week I mentioned that Morgan Spurlock’s new series, 30 Days, might run the risk of being predictible. This weeks episode, Anti-Aging, was predictible only in the sense I was sure the man using the steroids would have some negative side-effects, but I could have never predicted how severe they would be.

This was the first episode to not feature Mr. Spurlock as the test subject, instead we are introduced to Scott Bridges, 35, married father of 3. Mr. Bridges used to be a high school and college athelete, and was in great shape. With his age quickly catching up with him, and not being in any form of shape, he wants to fight back against the mid-life realities. He agrees to go on a program of hormones, testosterone and a daily dose of some 21 odd pills (at one point they also say 40 pills…not sure which is correct). He also begins weight training and cardio workouts with professional trainers and radically changes his diet.

Things go well at first. He starts to feel more energetic, people are telling him he looks more youthful and it seems like it may be working. Some of the first hurdles to pop up though are things like, oh…HIS LIFE? Look back at everything I said he was doing, then remember, he has a full time job and 3 kids! Sure, everyone should lead a healthier life, but at what cost to those around you? This does become a sore spot between Scott and his wife, and eventually between his wife and the cardio trainer. The cardio trainer essentially tells Scott’s wife that nothing besides the cardio matters and tries to tell the wife how things will be. Look, the wife was no angel, she seemed a bit snippy to me through the whole episode, but the cardio trainer had no right talking to her like that.

It was after this though that the whole experiment started to fall apart. Scott’s liver started acting abnormally. He started getting angrier with people (a known side effect of testosterone, as it is a steroid). One of the biggest shocks of all though, was he had his semen tested before he started to watch for sterility. At the time this started, he had an excellent sperm count of 80 million per CC, normal is 60 million per CC. After taking all these drugs, within weeks, his count was 1 million per CC, and 100% of those were dead. In general, all these “helpful” drugs, were having some very negative effects.

As an aside, the funniest moment of the entire episode had to be when he took all his pills with him to talk to his weight trainer, a hulking professional body builder. Even he was shocked at the number of supplements Scott was taking, and said that even he didn’t take this many. You have to see it to get the humor, but it was highly amusing.

To Scott’s credit, he dropped out of the experiment at 21 days, and we were informed with title cards that his liver function returned to normal, his sperm count went back up and through all of this, he lost 15 pounds.

The one aspect I am very happy with the show is that even though Spurlock isn’t doing all the experiments himself, he does appear through out the episode doing like little side notes that enhance the overall point. Nice to see him doing that as his commentaries really do spruce up his projects.

Next week, a Christian spends 30 days as a Muslim. Oh this should be interesting.

22
Jun
2005

As with any list, some I agree with, some I don’t.

1. ?Frankly, my dear, I don?t give a damn,? ?Gone With the Wind,? 1939.
2. ?I?m going to make him an offer he can?t refuse,? ?The Godfather,? 1972.
3. ?You don?t understand! I coulda had class. I coulda been a contender. I could?ve been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what I am,? ?On the Waterfront,? 1954.
4. ?Toto, I?ve got a feeling we?re not in Kansas anymore,? ?The Wizard of Oz,? 1939.
5. ?Here?s looking at you, kid,? ?Casablanca,? 1942.
6. ?Go ahead, make my day,? ?Sudden Impact,? 1983.
7. ?All right, Mr. DeMille, I?m ready for my close-up,? ?Sunset Blvd.,? 1950.
8. ?May the Force be with you,? ?Star Wars,? 1977.
9. ?Fasten your seatbelts. It?s going to be a bumpy night,? ?All About Eve,? 1950.
10. ?You talking to me?? ?Taxi Driver,? 1976.
11. ?What we?ve got here is failure to communicate,? ?Cool Hand Luke,? 1967.
12. ?I love the smell of napalm in the morning,? ?Apocalypse Now,? 1979.
13. ?Love means never having to say you?re sorry,? ?Love Story,? 1970.
14. ?The stuff that dreams are made of,? ?The Maltese Falcon,? 1941.
15. ?E.T. phone home,? ?E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial,? 1982.
16. ?They call me Mister Tibbs!?, ?In the Heat of the Night,? 1967.
17. ?Rosebud,? ?Citizen Kane,? 1941.
18. ?Made it, Ma! Top of the world!?, ?White Heat,? 1949.
19. ?I?m as mad as hell, and I?m not going to take this anymore!?, ?Network,? 1976.
20. ?Louis, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship,? ?Casablanca,? 1942.
21. ?A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti,? ?The Silence of the Lambs,? 1991.
22. ?Bond. James Bond,? ?Dr. No,? 1962.
23. ?There?s no place like home,? ?The Wizard of Oz,? 1939.
24. ?I am big! It?s the pictures that got small,? ?Sunset Blvd.,? 1950.
25. ?Show me the money!?, ?Jerry Maguire,? 1996.
26. ?Why don?t you come up sometime and see me??, ?She Done Him Wrong,? 1933.
27. ?I?m walking here! I?m walking here!?, ?Midnight Cowboy,? 1969.
28. ?Play it, Sam. Play ?As Time Goes By,?? ?Casablanca,? 1942.
29. ?You can?t handle the truth!?, ?A Few Good Men,? 1992.
30. ?I want to be alone,? ?Grand Hotel,? 1932.
31. ?After all, tomorrow is another day!?, ?Gone With the Wind,? 1939.
32. ?Round up the usual suspects,? ?Casablanca,? 1942.
33. ?I?ll have what she?s having,? ?When Harry Met Sally…,? 1989.
34. ?You know how to whistle, don?t you, Steve? You just put your lips together and blow,? ?To Have and Have Not,? 1944.
35. ?You?re gonna need a bigger boat,? ?Jaws,? 1975.
36. ?Badges? We ain?t got no badges! We don?t need no badges! I don?t have to show you any stinking badges!?, ?The Treasure of the Sierra Madre,? 1948.
37. ?I?ll be back,? ?The Terminator,? 1984.
38. ?Today, I consider myself the luckiest man on the face of the earth,? ?The Pride of the Yankees,? 1942.
39. ?If you build it, he will come,? ?Field of Dreams,? 1989.
40. ?Mama always said life was like a box of chocolates. You never know what you?re gonna get,? ?Forrest Gump,? 1994.
41. ?We rob banks,? ?Bonnie and Clyde,? 1967.
42. ?Plastics,? ?The Graduate,? 1967.
43. ?We?ll always have Paris,? ?Casablanca,? 1942.
44. ?I see dead people,? ?The Sixth Sense,? 1999.
45. ?Stella! Hey, Stella!?, ?A Streetcar Named Desire,? 1951.
46. ?Oh, Jerry, don?t let?s ask for the moon. We have the stars,? ?Now, Voyager,? 1942.
47. ?Shane. Shane. Come back!?, ?Shane,? 1953.
48. ?Well, nobody?s perfect,? ?Some Like It Hot,? 1959.
49. ?It?s alive! It?s alive!?, ?Frankenstein,? 1931.
50. ?Houston, we have a problem,? ?Apollo 13,? 1995.
51. ?You?ve got to ask yourself one question: ?Do I feel lucky?? Well, do ya, punk??, ?Dirty Harry,? 1971.
52. ?You had me at ?hello,?? ?Jerry Maguire,? 1996.
53. ?One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas, I don?t know,? ?Animal Crackers,? 1930.
54. ?There?s no crying in baseball!?, ?A League of Their Own,? 1992.
55. ?La-dee-da, la-dee-da,? ?Annie Hall,? 1977.
56. ?A boy?s best friend is his mother,? ?Psycho,? 1960.
57. ?Greed, for lack of a better word, is good,? ?Wall Street,? 1987.
58. ?Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer,? ?The Godfather Part II,? 1974.
59. ?As God is my witness, I?ll never be hungry again,? ?Gone With the Wind,? 1939.
60. ?Well, here?s another nice mess you?ve gotten me into!?, ?Sons of the Desert,? 1933.
61. ?Say ?hello? to my little friend!?, ?Scarface,? 1983.
62. ?What a dump,? ?Beyond the Forest,? 1949.
63. ?Mrs. Robinson, you?re trying to seduce me. Aren?t you??, ?The Graduate,? 1967.
64. ?Gentlemen, you can?t fight in here! This is the War Room!?, ?Dr. Strangelove,? 1964.
65. ?Elementary, my dear Watson,? ?The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes,? 1929.
66. ?Get your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape,? ?Planet of the Apes,? 1968.
67. ?Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, she walks into mine,? ?Casablanca,? 1942.
68. ?Here?s Johnny!?, ?The Shining,? 1980.
69. ?They?re here!?, ?Poltergeist,? 1982.
70. ?Is it safe??, ?Marathon Man,? 1976.
71. ?Wait a minute, wait a minute. You ain?t heard nothin? yet!?, ?The Jazz Singer,? 1927.
72. ?No wire hangers, ever!?, ?Mommie Dearest,? 1981.
73. ?Mother of mercy, is this the end of Rico??, ?Little Caesar,? 1930.
74. ?Forget it, Jake, it?s Chinatown,? ?Chinatown,? 1974.
75. ?I have always depended on the kindness of strangers,? ?A Streetcar Named Desire,? 1951.
76. ?Hasta la vista, baby,? ?Terminator 2: Judgment Day,? 1991.
77. ?Soylent Green is people!?, ?Soylent Green,? 1973.
78. ?Open the pod bay doors, HAL,? ?2001: A Space Odyssey,? 1968.
79. Striker: ?Surely you can?t be serious.? Rumack: ?I am serious … and don?t call me Shirley,? ?Airplane!?, 1980.
80. ?Yo, Adrian!?, ?Rocky,? 1976.
81. ?Hello, gorgeous,? ?Funny Girl,? 1968.
82. ?Toga! Toga!?, ?National Lampoon?s Animal House,? 1978.
83. ?Listen to them. Children of the night. What music they make,? ?Dracula,? 1931.
84. ?Oh, no, it wasn?t the airplanes. It was Beauty killed the Beast,? ?King Kong,? 1933.
85. ?My precious,? ?The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers,? 2002.
86. ?Attica! Attica!?, ?Dog Day Afternoon,? 1975.
87. ?Sawyer, you?re going out a youngster, but you?ve got to come back a star!?, ?42nd Street,? 1933.
88. ?Listen to me, mister. You?re my knight in shining armor. Don?t you forget it. You?re going to get back on that horse, and I?m going to be right behind you, holding on tight, and away we?re gonna go, go, go!?, ?On Golden Pond,? 1981.
89. ?Tell ?em to go out there with all they got and win just one for the Gipper,? ?Knute Rockne, All American,? 1940.
90. ?A martini. Shaken, not stirred,? ?Goldfinger,? 1964
91. ?Who?s on first,? ?The Naughty Nineties,? 1945.
92. ?Cinderella story. Outta nowhere. A former greenskeeper, now, about to become the Masters champion. It looks like a mirac … It?s in the hole! It?s in the hole! It?s in the hole!?, ?Caddyshack,? 1980.
93. ?Life is a banquet, and most poor suckers are starving to death!?, ?Auntie Mame,? 1958.
94. ?I feel the need ? the need for speed!?, ?Top Gun,? 1986.
95. ?Carpe diem. Seize the day, boys. Make your lives extraordinary,? ?Dead Poets Society,? 1989.
96. ?Snap out of it!?, ?Moonstruck,? 1987.
97. ?My mother thanks you. My father thanks you. My sister thanks you. And I thank you,? ?Yankee Doodle Dandy,? 1942.
98. ?Nobody puts Baby in a corner,? ?Dirty Dancing,? 1987.
99. ?I?ll get you, my pretty, and your little dog, too!?, ?The Wizard of Oz,? 1939.
100. ?I?m king of the world!?, ?Titanic,? 1997.

22
Jun
2005
Written by  |  under General  |  No Comments

My birthday is coming up on July 20th. Boy, my Amazon Wishlist sure is getting out of control in size. *whistles innocently*

21
Jun
2005

I stumbled on this picture over at engadget.com today.

Commodore 64

Yes boys and girls, this is a Commodore 64, this is what my very first computer looked like. It consisted of a keyboard only at first. The os (operating system), if you can really call it that, was hard wired into it. You would then plug it into either a Commodore moniter (pictured here) or a special tv/moniter set that were pretty expensive at the time. If you wanted to get really fancy, you would add on a 5.25″ floppy drive…the big honking thing to the side there, that, I swear, weighed 10 lbs all on it’s own.

This was cutting edge technology in the 1980′s folks. The 64 stood for 64 kilobytes of RAM (Random Access Memory). You read that right…64 kilobytes. Compared to a computer’s minimum now of 256 megabytes, that means a standard computer today is running 262,144 kilobytes. (thank you onlineconversion.com!) Don’t even try to ponder what computers with 1 – 4 gigabytes of RAM have in comparison!

The fun thing about the C64 (as most of us called it), was that anyone could write a program in BASIC (a computer language) with it. You could do simple programs, or rather lengthy complex ones. I think everyone who ever owned a C64 though did this one:

10 PRINT “Hello”
20 Goto 10

You would enter “RUN” and the screen would print out Hello over and over again until you stopped it. Hours of fun I tell ya! Of course, if you didn’t have the behemoth floppy drive to save it to, you lost the program you had written once you turned it off, but oh well. Not a big problem if you were just doing small things like the one I just showed you, but if you wanted to write a big long program, you really needed the floppy drive. (something I did not have for a year or two after I got the C64….can you tell I was bitter?)

The C64 was also the first time I entered the online world. Armed with a mighty 9600 baud modem, I called up CompuServe for the first time in September 1986. (id# 71211,2513 just in case you were wondering! ) I thought I had died and gone to heaven. It was then I started playing with the internet, and have obviouslly, never looked back.

This memory kick-start couldn’t have come at a more intriguing time though. My new computer shipped to me today and I got my laptop back from the repair shop yesterday. I have computers on the brain, so it’s kind of fun to walk down memory lane and remember where most of us got our start. Wikipedia (one of the greatest resources on the web I tell ya!) has a lengthy, and fascinating entry on the C64 that you can read here if you want to know more. One thing that entry mentions that I had forgotten, when the C64 first came out, the price was…$595.