<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Film Registery Additions For 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seanpaune.com/2006/12/27/national-film-registery-additions-for-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seanpaune.com/2006/12/27/national-film-registery-additions-for-2006/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:24:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: National Film Registery Additions For 2008 - SeanPAune.com</title>
		<link>http://www.seanpaune.com/2006/12/27/national-film-registery-additions-for-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-35326</link>
		<dc:creator>National Film Registery Additions For 2008 - SeanPAune.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanpaune.com/?p=903#comment-35326</guid>
		<description>[...] can also check out the additions for 2006 and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can also check out the additions for 2006 and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P Aune</title>
		<link>http://www.seanpaune.com/2006/12/27/national-film-registery-additions-for-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-12590</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P Aune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanpaune.com/?p=903#comment-12590</guid>
		<description>Roy - You give the US government FAR too much credit to think that deeply *laugh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roy &#8211; You give the US government FAR too much credit to think that deeply *laugh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.seanpaune.com/2006/12/27/national-film-registery-additions-for-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-12575</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanpaune.com/?p=903#comment-12575</guid>
		<description>While Groundhog day may be thought of as just another comedy it is laced with taoist and eastern philosophy, and also the more current &quot;present moment awareness&quot; movement is spiritual circles, that I thought was very clever. It was one of the first DVDs I ever bought and I believe will be one of those films, like &quot;The Matrix&quot; that people refer to in future generations. Kind of like how &quot;Winnie the Pooh&quot; has been analyzed and repackages as the &quot;Tao of Pooh&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Groundhog day may be thought of as just another comedy it is laced with taoist and eastern philosophy, and also the more current &#8220;present moment awareness&#8221; movement is spiritual circles, that I thought was very clever. It was one of the first DVDs I ever bought and I believe will be one of those films, like &#8220;The Matrix&#8221; that people refer to in future generations. Kind of like how &#8220;Winnie the Pooh&#8221; has been analyzed and repackages as the &#8220;Tao of Pooh&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P Aune</title>
		<link>http://www.seanpaune.com/2006/12/27/national-film-registery-additions-for-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-12489</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P Aune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanpaune.com/?p=903#comment-12489</guid>
		<description>hmm Good point, but I&#039;m still not 100% sold on it&#039;s inclusion.  This year&#039;s inductees the total number of films in the registery to 450, and I&#039;m just having a hard time believing that there aren&#039;t some older films that are more deserving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm Good point, but I&#8217;m still not 100% sold on it&#8217;s inclusion.  This year&#8217;s inductees the total number of films in the registery to 450, and I&#8217;m just having a hard time believing that there aren&#8217;t some older films that are more deserving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shari</title>
		<link>http://www.seanpaune.com/2006/12/27/national-film-registery-additions-for-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-12488</link>
		<dc:creator>Shari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanpaune.com/?p=903#comment-12488</guid>
		<description>I think that Groundhog Day isn&#039;t worth preserving for the story but rather for the fim-making feat of repeating the same content again and again in the movie and keeping it interesting and funny. That&#039;s no small feat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Groundhog Day isn&#8217;t worth preserving for the story but rather for the fim-making feat of repeating the same content again and again in the movie and keeping it interesting and funny. That&#8217;s no small feat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
