<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family Guy Sucks&#8230; Video Proof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seanpaune.com/2007/05/12/family-guy-sucks-video-proof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seanpaune.com/2007/05/12/family-guy-sucks-video-proof/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:21:01 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean P Aune</title>
		<link>http://www.seanpaune.com/2007/05/12/family-guy-sucks-video-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-16444</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P Aune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 15:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanpaune.com/2007/05/12/family-guy-sucks-video-proof/#comment-16444</guid>
		<description>Shari - I totally agree with you that is difficult to avoid similar gags, and I also agree Simpsons retread some stuff from the classic comedy teams.  There is a point though when you are even retreading the dialog exactly that you have to go &quot;wow... that really is just plain laziness&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shari &#8211; I totally agree with you that is difficult to avoid similar gags, and I also agree Simpsons retread some stuff from the classic comedy teams.  There is a point though when you are even retreading the dialog exactly that you have to go &#8220;wow&#8230; that really is just plain laziness&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shari</title>
		<link>http://www.seanpaune.com/2007/05/12/family-guy-sucks-video-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-16443</link>
		<dc:creator>Shari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 08:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanpaune.com/2007/05/12/family-guy-sucks-video-proof/#comment-16443</guid>
		<description>To be fair, even South Park recognized that the Simpsons have made so many episodes at this point that it&#039;s nearly impossible to avoid repeating something they&#039;ve done (&quot;Simpsons Did It&quot;). Also, the Simpsons themselves have ripped off a lot of their scenarios and gags from even older sources. The bit where the dogs eat every bite as Home tries to eat is definitely a retread of something older and oft-repeated (likely the Marx Brothers or Three Stooges).

The Simpsons has an older writing staff that is aping a lot of things which their audience has not been exposed to so they get credit for being more original than they really are. In many cases, such &quot;rip-offs&quot; are unconscious as people don&#039;t even remember their exposure to such things and it pops to mind as what they believe to be a unique thought.

I&#039;m not saying &quot;Family Guy&quot; is great or &quot;The Simpsons&quot; is bad but just that this clip is very  misleading. There is an extremely high likelihood that anyone with knowledge and access to old comedy (&quot;I Love Lucy&quot; would probably be a big one as well) could probably put together a similar clip showing the Simpsons &quot;ripping off&quot; these sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, even South Park recognized that the Simpsons have made so many episodes at this point that it&#8217;s nearly impossible to avoid repeating something they&#8217;ve done (&#8220;Simpsons Did It&#8221;). Also, the Simpsons themselves have ripped off a lot of their scenarios and gags from even older sources. The bit where the dogs eat every bite as Home tries to eat is definitely a retread of something older and oft-repeated (likely the Marx Brothers or Three Stooges).</p>
<p>The Simpsons has an older writing staff that is aping a lot of things which their audience has not been exposed to so they get credit for being more original than they really are. In many cases, such &#8220;rip-offs&#8221; are unconscious as people don&#8217;t even remember their exposure to such things and it pops to mind as what they believe to be a unique thought.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying &#8220;Family Guy&#8221; is great or &#8220;The Simpsons&#8221; is bad but just that this clip is very  misleading. There is an extremely high likelihood that anyone with knowledge and access to old comedy (&#8220;I Love Lucy&#8221; would probably be a big one as well) could probably put together a similar clip showing the Simpsons &#8220;ripping off&#8221; these sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
