<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kitchen Confidential DVD Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seanpaune.com/2007/06/03/kitchen-confidential-dvd-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seanpaune.com/2007/06/03/kitchen-confidential-dvd-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:04:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean P Aune</title>
		<link>http://www.seanpaune.com/2007/06/03/kitchen-confidential-dvd-review/comment-page-1/#comment-16937</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P Aune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanpaune.com/2007/06/03/kitchen-confidential-dvd-review/#comment-16937</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve come to expect one-dimensional characters from sitcoms anymore, I just tend to gloss over them in that entire genre.   I know you said you didn&#039;t like Friends, but look at Joey: 10 seasons on Friends and 2 seasons on his own... for a one note character.  

I did see potential down the road, and we did get it in episodes like episode #8 &quot;Teddy, Takes Off&quot; where we learned about Jack and Teddy&#039;s strained relationship.  

I just wish Fox had given it some more time to find an audience, but, then they wouldn&#039;t be Fox if they had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve come to expect one-dimensional characters from sitcoms anymore, I just tend to gloss over them in that entire genre.   I know you said you didn&#8217;t like Friends, but look at Joey: 10 seasons on Friends and 2 seasons on his own&#8230; for a one note character.  </p>
<p>I did see potential down the road, and we did get it in episodes like episode #8 &#8220;Teddy, Takes Off&#8221; where we learned about Jack and Teddy&#8217;s strained relationship.  </p>
<p>I just wish Fox had given it some more time to find an audience, but, then they wouldn&#8217;t be Fox if they had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shari</title>
		<link>http://www.seanpaune.com/2007/06/03/kitchen-confidential-dvd-review/comment-page-1/#comment-16936</link>
		<dc:creator>Shari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanpaune.com/2007/06/03/kitchen-confidential-dvd-review/#comment-16936</guid>
		<description>This is actually airing on Fox Japan right now and I have been watching it, mainly because nothing else is on. I&#039;m afraid that I can&#039;t agree with your conclusions about how funny/good it is. I thought it was ok but didn&#039;t quite come together well. 

As you mentioned, part of the problem was the cliches but there were other issues. One thing is that all the characters were fairly one-dimensional aside from Jack. I&#039;m sure they were written this way because the cast was so large that they wanted to quickly imprint the characters on the viewer in a memorable way. Unfortunately, I think this made the characters hard to identify with and made the show relatively farcical when it focused on some of the peripheral characters.

The other problem was that it&#039;s harder to understand or track the relationships between the characters when so many of them are interacting for such a brief time. The characters needed to be paired up (a la Friends - the large cast worked well there because it was broken off into pairs with two satellite characters moving between the pairs - though I actually don&#039;t like Friends) so the relationships could be easier to see and the characters would be more sharply defined from the interaction between each member of each pair.

I think the show may have been better after it had a chance to mature but I wouldn&#039;t see it as something that showed strong potential just out of the gate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually airing on Fox Japan right now and I have been watching it, mainly because nothing else is on. I&#8217;m afraid that I can&#8217;t agree with your conclusions about how funny/good it is. I thought it was ok but didn&#8217;t quite come together well. </p>
<p>As you mentioned, part of the problem was the cliches but there were other issues. One thing is that all the characters were fairly one-dimensional aside from Jack. I&#8217;m sure they were written this way because the cast was so large that they wanted to quickly imprint the characters on the viewer in a memorable way. Unfortunately, I think this made the characters hard to identify with and made the show relatively farcical when it focused on some of the peripheral characters.</p>
<p>The other problem was that it&#8217;s harder to understand or track the relationships between the characters when so many of them are interacting for such a brief time. The characters needed to be paired up (a la Friends &#8211; the large cast worked well there because it was broken off into pairs with two satellite characters moving between the pairs &#8211; though I actually don&#8217;t like Friends) so the relationships could be easier to see and the characters would be more sharply defined from the interaction between each member of each pair.</p>
<p>I think the show may have been better after it had a chance to mature but I wouldn&#8217;t see it as something that showed strong potential just out of the gate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
