13
Dec
2007

Merriam-Webster word of the year isn’t even a word

Written by  |  under General, Writing

w00t!So, Merriam-Webster conducted a poll of what their visitors thought the word of the year was.

w00t… w-zero-zero-t

This isn’t a word people, it’s a sound.  It’s like the dictionary adding “d’oh” from The Simpsons, it annoys me as it is not a real word.  Sounds should not be in the dictionary, I’m sorry, but I just don’t think they should be.

While w00t hasn’t made it yet, it could, especially with this backing it, which make me think I will never, ever, use this word again for any reason…

Tags: ,

3 Responses so far | Have Your Say!  |  Comments RSS

  1. Contrary Jack  |  December 14th, 2007 at 10:59 am #

    w00t? D’oh?

    Bah! Hey! Yahoo! Hurrah!

    Ahem…

    …which is to say, the interjection is a well-established lexical category. Words are sounds with meaning attached.

    Contrary Jack - Gravatar
  2. Sean P Aune  |  December 14th, 2007 at 11:02 am #

    I suspected this would get a comment from you *laugh* I don’t consider the one’s you mentioned, with the exception of “Yahoo” words. And in the case of w00t… it’s usually spelled with numbers… I just don’t get it.

    Sean P Aune - Gravatar
  3. Nikki  |  December 20th, 2007 at 5:17 pm #

    I’m okay with interjections and sounds as words, however, I am NOT okay with a word like w00t, simply because you can’t spell words with numbers! You can’t spell words with numbers!! Never in the history of the world has there ever been a word with a number in it. And there shouldn’t be. You keep those numbers away from my words. They don’t belong there. This is not math class! Segregation now!

    Nikki - Gravatar

Leave a Feedback

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>