Iron Man 3 has begun production in North Carolina, and now we have a better idea of who he will be fighting this time around.
Coming off the success of The Avengers, Iron Man 3 is already filming, and while there have been reports of Ben Kingsley is playing an unnamed enemy that specializes in nano-technology, there seems there will be some brute force as well.
Ashley Hamilton has been cast as Jack Taggert, who is better known as Firepower in Iron Man lore. Beyond the silly name, as you can see from the picture to the right, it’s fitting.
What concerns me is that supposedly James Badge Dale has been cast as Eric Savin, also known as Coldblood.
As tend to happens with comic book movies, the studios seem to think the higher the film number, the higher the villain count needs to be. Hopefully some of these villains will not be featured players but more like one off, quick fight situations.
Jon Favreau isn’t directing this time around, but he will appear as Tony Stark’s driver, Happy Hogan. Here’s hoping he might at least speak up and say, “Do you really need these many people to fight?”
Just in case you were unaware of it, The Dark Knight Rises comes out on July 20. Of course, the way the Warner Brothers marketing department is ratcheting up its push, it’s doubtful you’ll be unaware for long.
I understand that a lot of movies do need to advertise to draw in viewers, but there are some event movies that you have to wonder why anyone bothers. Christopher Nolan’s last outing in the Batman universe, The Dark Knight Rises, is one of those films that does leave me scratching my head a bit when it comes to marketing.
We’re almost a two full months out from the film, and already we’re getting TV spots showing up everywhere. You could probably start running ads the week before release and be good, but instead its still the old system of spending a $100 million or more on a tentpole release. And people wonder why films have such a hard time hitting profitability.
Either way, enjoy the new TV spots and the ton of posters and banners after the jump.
DC Comics has announced that an iconic character will soon be coming out as gay.
Co-publisher Dan DiDio of DC Comics was speaking at the Kapow Comic Convention in London on Sunday according to Bleeding Cool where he revealed that a character would be coming out as gay. There has been soem debate if it is a character currently present in the recently relaunched DC universe (also known as “52″), or if it is someone that has not yet appeared, but ABC News seems to have clarified that a bit. The news source followed up on this with Courtney Simmons, DC Entertainment’s senior vice president of publicity, and learned “One of the major iconic DC characters will reveal that he is gay in a storyline in June.” So, there you have it, it is someone iconic, and all of the big ones are currently in titles.
So, who could it be? What DC character we previously thought was heterosexual will come out as gay? I’ve run down all of the male iconic characters with my thoughts on each as to why or why not.
Iconic DC Characters
Superman – No way, no how. With the Man of Steel movie on the way, and his status as being for “truth, justice and the American way,” Superman is about as American as apple pie (in spite of renouncing his citizenship). There is no way DC is going to touch this flagship character.
Batman – As with Superman, he has a major movie about to hit theaters with The Dark Knight Rises. There is also the issue that DC has had to fight off speculation of Batman being gay ever since the 1954 publication of the reprehensible Seduction of the Innocent. Anytime it has been mentioned in the past, people immediately leap to pointing out he lives with Robin and Alfred. There is just no way they will open this can of worms.
Robin – The current Robin is actually Bruce Wayne’s son with Talia al Ghul, Damian Wayne. He has a troubled past and is currently around 10-years-old. They could, in theory go with him coming out as gay as it would not cause any “Batman and Robin are lovers” questions, and also his dating would not have to be dealt with due to his age. This is a definite possibility.
Aquaman – DC is currently trying to make him edgier and more likable. That almost entirely eliminates him from the running along with the fact he is married to Mera.
Green Lantern (Hal Jordan) – Hal has always had a reputation as a ladies man, especially in his relationship with Carol Ferris. Seems unlikely.
Green Lantern (Guy Gardner, Kyle Rayner or John Stewart) – Would be viewed as a cop out. ”You made Green Lantern gay!” ”Well, not really …”
Martian Manhunter – While a founding member of the Justice League of America, he is a Martian and it is doubtful anyone would care.
Green Arrow – With his TV show Arrow about to start up, he seems unlikely. Additionally, a lot of his history is built around his romance with Black Canary.
Hawkman – It totally depends on if DC is running with the Carter Hall or Katar Hol version of the story which they have yet to make clear. If it’s Carter Hall, then absolutely no way as he is a cursed Egyptian who keeps getting reincarnated with his female love. If it’s Katar Hol, he is from Thangar and is an alien. Any way you slice it, I just don’t see it being Hawkman.
Flash – In the current 52 continuity, Barry Allen never married Iris, and is only in a dating relationship with another character. Of all the longtime characters, the Flash is my current pick for coming out as he is iconic, but not one of the frontline characters. He is also the most easily pushed aside should this backfire on DC. (I’ve lost count of the number of times Barry Allen has been killed, so don’t put it past DC to just change things.)
Iconic, but Secondary, DC Characters
Alfred - Batman’s butler seems like a safe choice, and like Damian, due to his age dating wouldn’t be a huge issue.
Jimmy Olson – Superman’s pal, Jimmy Olson. He has had his own comic series back in the day, and he is a fairly well-known figure. This is a slight possibility.
Who is the Gay DC Comics Character?
Essentially I’m down to two choices due to I don’t think that DC will go the route of Alfred or Jimmy, Robin and Flash. Robin has a lot of pros to him due to his age, but at the same time they can act as cons, so, I’m going with … The Flash.
He’s iconic enough.
Doesn’t have a movie or TV show on the line.
Can easily be changed due to time travel issues.
Doesn’t mess with the big named characters
I honestly think he’s the only logical choice, but I guess we’ll find out for sure next month.
As for if I think this is a good idea … that too will depend on what we find out next month.
UPDATED:It’s Alan Scott, the original Green Lantern. That’s stretching the “iconic” term a bit.
Well, never fear, it was announced today that The CW has ordered the pilot to series according to TV Line, so now we can all enjoy in the pain. At the same time the network also picked up it’s re-imagining of Beauty and the Beast as well as the Sex and the City prequel The Carrie Diaries, so apparently the network just wants to annoy as many fan bases as possible in one season.
Seeing as The CW canceled The Secret Circle and Ringer today, but renewed Nikita, it looks like you can expect these new shows to air sometime between Monday and Thursday as Friday is full and it doesn’t run original content on the weekends.
Universal looks set to announce it’s moving ahead on Kick-Ass 2, and filming may kick off as soon as August.
According to sources speaking with Deadline, Universal has picked up the rights to Kick-Ass from Lionsgate and plans to move full-speed ahead on a sequel to the cult hit. New deals will need to be struck with the characters who played the three surviving characters: Aaron Johnson (Dave/Kick-Ass), Christopher Mintz-Plasse (Chris/Red Mist) and Chloe Moretz (Mindy/Hit-Girl). It will be Moretz that may pose the most issues as she has aged quite a bit since the original and has become quite the in-demand actress since the original film. (Mainly because she stole the film.)
Matthew Vaughn who directed the original is committed to the X-Men: First Class sequel, so he would be unavailable when it came time to film. He, however, has supposedly given his blessing to new director Jeff Wadlow who has also penned the script.
The original film was made for $30 million and grossed $48 million domestic and $48 million foreign for a $96 million worldwide gross. While it didn’t make a huge return on its theatrical run, it has gone on to do well on home video and build up a cult following. In a lot of cases such as this, the sequel will perform better than original as people who got acquainted with the original via home viewings wil go out to see the follow-up. Will it be a giant hit? Nope. Will I be thrilled to get a sequel? While I loved the original, it had its issues (I still can’t get over that jet pack), but I would gladly plopped down my money for another outing with Kick-Ass and Hit-Girl.
If you’ve seen The Avengers, you’ve seen the end credits scene with the purple guy. If you haven’t seen it yet, just move on to another post on this blog.
During the credits for The Avengers there is a scene that takes place between the leader of the alien army and a mysterious purple guy in armor. If you aren’t a comic reader you have no clue who this is, but to those of us who have read Marvel comics for any length of time will immediately shout, “THANOS!”
First appearing in Iron Man #55 in 1973, Thanos has gone from an oddball villain to “The Mad Titan” who ended up killing off half the universe and pretty much every hero of Earth in the 1991 limited series, The Infinity Gauntlet. Since that time he has been a bit more ambiguous as to what his motivations are, but suffice to say it appears he’s going to be a major pain-in-the-behind for the Marvel cinematic universe.
Born on Saturn’s moon of Titan, Thanos belongs to a race known as the Eternals. While most of them appear human, Thanos was born with the Deviant gene which makes him look like the Eternals cousin race, you guessed it, the Deviants. (Hey, Marvel wasn’t known for being overly original in the 1970′s and 80′s …) Due to not looking like his race, he became secluded and fascinated by the darker things in life, eventually falling in love with Mistress Death, the embodiment of death in the Marvel Universe. After going completely mad and slaughtering nearly all of the other Titans, he eventually launched on a crusade to impress Mistress Death so she would fall madly in love with him.
Thanos set out to collect the six Infinity Gems, also known as Soul Gems. The six each represented a different aspect of reality: Time, Space, Soul, Mind, Reality and Power. He combined the six gems on to what was dubbed the Infinity Gauntlet and with a wave of his hand wiped out half of the population of the universe. Of course Earth’s heroes attempted to take him on, but they all met Mistress Death for their trouble.
When the true cosmic players of the universe finally got involved, they were able to get the gauntlet away from Thanos and undid all of the damage he had done, and the Mad Titan went to live on a farm on a desolate world. He has shown up from time to time, but never in such a grandiose way.
So, what will the Marvel movies do with him? Well, I think it’s fairly obvious this isn’t Farmer Thanos. If they plan to introduce the Infinity Gauntlet, however is a different matter. The glove was actually in the background of Thor in Odin’s armory. Marvel even released an official photo of the prop that you can see at the bottom of this post. So the Gauntlet, while never mentioned, has been established as existing in the film continuity.
The question now is what Marvel plans to do with him. As Thanos as obviously a big, huge bad, I can’t imagine him showing up in Iron Man 3 or Captain America 2. As I suspect he will be picking up the gauntlet at some point, my suspicion is he will play a major part in Thor 2. The only problem here is the release schedule actually goes Iron Man 3, Thor 2, Captain America 2 and then The Avengers 2. So Marvel could mention the gauntlet has gone missing, then have Captain America talk to S.H.I.E.L.D. about it and … oh who knows, I’m sure there is a plan written down somewhere.
Any way you slice it, Thanos is here, and the Marvel cinematic universe is going to feel it down to its core.
People who have seen The Avengers are saying that the Hulk comes off as one of the best characters. With this in mind, Marvel is ready to roll him out once again as a headlining character.
… Can we please stop this before it gets started?
Don’t get me wrong, I love the Hulk for the roll he’s played in the history of comics, and he makes a fabulous supporting character, but quite often he can go terribly off the rails when he is the lead. Yes, the comic has gone on for hundreds of issues now, but the only time I truly enjoyed him was when Marvel handed him over to Peter David to write, and the only reason that decision was made was because the publisher felt he could do no harm working on a character no one cared about. David took him in wild and fantastical directions – he became a mob enforcer in Las Vegas for a time known as Mr. Fixit as an example – but in general the character has just never been that engaging.
According to Deadline, the reaction to the Hulk in The Avengers is making them ponder what to do with the property next. Paul Gitter, President of Consumer Products for Marvel, recently told Forbes, “[Marvel] will spin him off to a stand-alone program next year.” Forbes went on to say that this will “presumably [be] supported by another big budget franchise movie in 2015. The entertainment studio is also exploring ways to promote Hulk as a ‘corporate icon’ similar to MetLife’s usage of Peanuts’ Snoopy, with Hulk’s image conveying a message about channeling strength to overcome workplace challenges.”
Yes, because using a character that turns in to a mindless machine of destruction is the perfect way to show strength in the workplace.
I have yet to see The Avengers, but I am already willing to bet there are three reasons the character worked: Mark Ruffalo’s performance, Joss Whedon’s writing and the fact that he is a supporting character. If Marvel/Disney was smart, they would realize that two first two aspects of that could be recreated in a stand-alone film, but not the third. There is also some talk of Guillermo del Toro working on producing a TV series over at ABC (which is also owned by Disney) that would bring the character back to the small screen. This I could potentially get behind as you have to dig deeper into Bruce Banner to understand the Hulk and a serialized format allows that where a two-hour film doesn’t.
In one way or another the Hulk will be hanging around again, but lets just hope Marvel has learned its lessons from the first two films. (side note, yes, I know Marvel didn’t do the first film by Ang Lee, but people still remember it and associated it with the property)
There is so much wrong with this new trailer for The Amazing Spider-Man that I don’t even know where to begin.
I have not been excited about The Amazing Spider-Man from day one, and I have to say with the more I see, the more justified I feel in that. From Gwen Stacey (Emma Stone) sounding like she knows Peter Parker’s (Andrew Garfield) secret, to hints in the trailer that his being bitten by the spider wasn’t an accident, this film is just hitting all the wrong notes for me. Of course, not that any of this really matter as Sony has already announced a release date for The Amazing Spider-Man 2.
If this new trailer proved anything to me, it’s that Marvel has to find some way, any way, to regain the film rights to the characters it signed off on ages ago. All of the contracts read that so long as the studios keep doing something new with the characters every so often, they can continue to hold on to them.
Who needs to wait for the home video release of a movie anymore to get a commentary track? Now you can just do it on clips as well!
While on the press junket leading up the U.S. release of The Avengers, Yahoo Movies got director and writer Joss Whedon to do a commentary track for a clip of the movie that had already been released. The clip shows off the fight between Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.) and Thor (Chris Hemsworth), with Whedon letting you know he didn’t want it to just be a throw away fight and how it came about.
You know, I enjoy a good commentary track from time to time, but doing it to clips? Seriously? Are we going to do it to trailers next? Promotional stills?
The latest trailer from the upcoming Dark Knight Rises promises a whole lot more than just action from the final installment of the Christopher Nolan Batman saga.
Beyond the confirmation that Selina Kyle/Catwoman (Anne Hathaway) is definitely teaming up with Batman (Christian Bale), we finally get a bit more of a look at John Blake (Joseph Gordon-Levitt). It’s obvious he’s a cop, but we see what appears to be him talking with Selina, and we see him drawing chalk bat symbols on wallas along with apparently lamenting the fact that Batman is gone. My suspicions that he is taken on as a protege by Batman are growing, but I still won’t go as far as to say that he becomes Robin.
Thankfully it also appears Bane (Tom Hardy) will be a bit easier to understand. Yay!
Nolan has a lot to live up to following on the brilliance of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, but the atmospheric nature of this trailer leads me to believe he will once again succeed. It’s just sad knowing this is the end of this brilliant run of films.
The Dark Knight Rises opens in theaters on July 20.
It’s hard to believe, but it looks like Sin City: A Dame to Kill For really is going to happen.
Announced just last week, Robert Rodriguez is already starting to discuss the casting process for the follow-up to his 2005 Sin City. Speaking with MTV, the director shared some details on who may return.
We still have to cast. I’m shooting Machete [Kills] next month, and we go right into Sin City [A Dame to Kill For]. It might overlap, but we haven’t done any casting yet, except for the people who we know are already in it and returning. A Dame to Kill For, all those people come back. I just had lunch with Mickey [Rourke] this weekend. He’s all excited to come back, but he’s probably the first one. I saw Rosario [Dawson] too. I ran into her for something else, and she’s pumped. They’ve always been excited about doing another one, so that will be fun.
As I explained previously, the Sin City books are done out of order, so although we saw Marv (Mickey Rourke) die in the first film, there is nothing stopping him from showing up in the sequel.
Rodriguez had this to say about the long rumored possibility of Angelina Jolie’s involvement with this project..
It was immediately [known] that we were going to do it. I think it was 2007, and I was already meeting with Angelina Jolie and people to do it. The Weinsteins had just started a new company. They just didn’t have the money to do it at the time. It was like, “Go do another movie or two and come back. We’ll be ready.” I went off and did a couple movies. Frank went off and did some movies. Then it got harder and harder to come back and find the time to do it. We missed that moment when it was ready to go. Then it was so far afterwards that it might as well have been any time now, but people never lost their appetite for it. They still come up to us and say “When are you doing another ‘Sin City’?” We thought we had to do it at some point. Now we’re just making the time.
I haven’t even gotten to meet with her yet about it or discuss with Frank about who we would want to go with or talk to first. That’s a fun process, but that probably won’t happen in the next month.
The last interesting tidbit was that everyone really enjoyed the format of the first film being three stories, and while they plan to keep with that theme for this time, only one of them will be made up of previous material.
Dramatically, the three-act structure has lasted and is tried and true. I did an anthology before called “Four Rooms,” and if you look it up, anthologies are never successful. That’s the end of that, I thought. Then I said, “I bet I can do an anthology if it’s the same director, and not four, not five, not eight stories. That’s too many.” Three is a good number. I think two is just weird. Three feels like a dramatic structure, even if they’re separate stories. I feels like one, two, three acts and maybe a wrap around. It worked on “Sin City,” and that’s probably the first anthology that ever worked, that I can think of. So I’m going to stick with that template because, one, I invented it. I can claim it and go, “I’m going to do it again.” If it doesn’t work, then I’ll know that “Sin City” was just a fluke.
If we did just one story, the audience might feel cheated that they didn’t get a bigger glimpse of it, especially having waited so long. So, lets go back to the three story structure. We’ll take A Dame to Kill For, which already pre-exists, and have Frank [Miller] come up with two more new stories and a wrap-around so it feels similar in structure to the first one, but even more expanded than that.
With the news that we’ll get two brand new stories set in Basin City, I’m more excited than ever to see this film take shape.
At long last it appears that Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller are ready to film Sin City: A Dame to Kill For.
The original Sin City was released in 2005 and was pretty much unlike any other film out there in the market at the time. A few have traveled down the same road (Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow), but none of them were quite as successful at it. While the film did okay at the box office ($40 million budget, $74 million domestic/$84.65 million foreign), it wasn’t a record breaker by any means. It did, however, make a profit, and Robert Rodriguez is known to be easy to work with and being able to keep his budgets under control. With that in mind, people have been begging for a sequel for seven years.
For those of you unfamiliar with how the Sin City books work, they are more vignettes of the lives of the characters and don’t follow a linear time line in publication. Although Marv, played brilliantly by Mickey Rourke in the first film, went to the electric chair in the first film, he may appear in the second film. The first film covered three of the stories – The Hard Goodbye, The Big Fat Kill and That Yellow Bastard as well as the short story, The Customer is Always Right – and it appears the second film will focus on A Dame to Kill For, but could very well include complete other stories or aspects of them. Untouched stories so far include Booze, Broads, & Bullets, Hell and Back and the graphic novel Family Values. In short, characters who died in the first one can very easily show up in a sequel.
Filming is due to begin this summer, and casting will begin next month. The actors from the first film who are needed to reprise their roles are all expected to return. No release date has been announced as of yet, but I’m very ready to return to Basin City.
You can see the full press release after the jump.