Supposedly something called a “Super Bowl” is being played this Sunday, and apparently people get excited over it?

I’ve never understood the fervor people show over the Super Bowl.  In the past I would tune in for the commercials they show, but since those started showing up online, why should I bother?

While I have nothing against the game of football, I just don’t get the excitement show over the professional version of the game as it’s just one time delay after another.  When you get up the Super Bowl it gets even worse.  The overblown production of everything down to the coin flip, the silliness surrounding the over produced half-time shows … I just don’t get it.  This game happens once a year, why in the world does it matter so much?

The Olympics?  The World Cup?  Those I get as they only happen once every four years, but people treat the Super Bowl as some sort of religious experience, and it just completely flies over my head.  I can even give you some wiggle room if your usual team makes it, but there are people that could care less normally about the teams that are playing, but yet become huge fans of them for the Super Bowl.

Honestly, if you like the game, fine by me, just don’t look at those of us who couldn’t care less like we’re got a second head and you can’t believe I’m walking around in public with “the normal folks”.  I don’t look at you weird because you still “don’t get” soccer, or actually think the Super Bowl is the biggest sporting event in the world (it isn’t), just watch your game and realize some of us couldn’t care less and that doesn’t make us somehow “wrong”.

I can’t wait to watch some movies on Sunday …

Post from: SeanPAune.com

Super Bowl XLV

ShareThis

Thank goodness no one was hurt, but this morning the Metrodome, home of the Minnesota Vikings, had its roof cave in from the 17-inches of snow that were on it. (watch closely, and around the 22 second mark you can see someone driving a cart on the far sideline to get out of there as quickly as possible.)

How in the world does someone build a structure in Minneapolis, with that much roof, and not plan for this much snow? I mean, if your stadium is in Dallas, I could see having this issue, but you’re in Minneapolis for crying out loud, your roof should be able to take multiple feet of snow at a time without even creaking!

Of course the good news, like I said, was no one was hurt, but can you imagine if this happened during a game? The Vikings were supposed to play the New York Giants tonight in that very stadium, but luckily they had already postponed the game until Monday. What if the stadium had been filled with people? Of course they need to repair the building now, and let us just hope they come up with a better solution.

Post from: SeanPAune.com

Metrodome Roof Collapses

ShareThis

It’s a sad day for the Rebellion. Ole Miss has picked its new mascot, and it’s not Admiral Ackbar.

In case you’ve forgotten, back in Feb., some students at Ole Miss were lobbying to get the Star Wars character Admiral Ackbar named as the new mascot for the school when the confederate general had been removed over complaints of it being insensitive.  Some students threatened to leave the school if this came to be, so obviously they’ll never have to live up to that threat now.

So, what won out over this noble space fish admiral?  What could be more regal than a giant talking lobster?

A bear.

“Rebel Black Bear” is his name … and he is boring with the obvious cool factor of our dear admiral.  You can see him below, and you can obviously see he is no where nearly as cool as Ackbar, but what can we do.

So, enjoy your boring ole bear, you fun killers.  Those of us who understand the majesty of Admiral Ackbar shall always carry him close to our hearts.

Post from: SeanPAune.com

Ole Miss Names New Mascot, Admiral Ackbar Is A Sad Mon Calamari

ShareThis

It’s hard to believe, but it’s over.

After 30 days and 64 games, World Cup 2010 has come to a close in South Africa.  Spain took home the trophy after a 1 to 0 victory over the Netherlands in overtime.  It was a tense game, but it sadly proved what I thought of Spain through out this entire tournament: they came in expected to win, but scoring eight goals in seven games pretty much tells you they got through based on their group.  They did not put in a World Cup worthy performance over the course of the month in my eyes, but what is done is done, and now we start the four year track to Brazil.

Before saying good bye to South Africa, let us hope FIFA stick to its word and reviews the use of video technology.  It’s time has come and would have solved a lot of problems this year.

Let us hope we never have to hear the word (or sounds of) vuvuzelas ever again.

And before we leave the dark continent, Shakira performed the official song “Waka Waka (This Time For Africa)” at the closing ceremonies.

And now we start the slow, long march towards Brazil in 2014.

It’s impossible to predict what countries will even be in the group of 32 when the tournament begins on June 13, 2014 (except of course the host nation).  My personal prediction?

Germany.

If Germany holds together the team we saw this year, which only lacked in experience due to their young ages, and they get four years of experience under their belts, they could be an unstoppable force.  They were tight, they were cohesive and they were one of the few teams that played as an actual team.  They were by far one of my favorite teams to watch this year, and I was rooting for them to go all the way, but at least they came in third.

Things may also be very different in this country come 2014 for the popularity of the sport.  Deadline Hollywood reports the final game pulled in 15.5 million viewers, the highest ratings ever for a football game broadcast in English in the United States.  Perhaps some of you are finally catching up to this amazing sport, and hopefully you’ll be tuning in again comes 2014.

I know I will be.

Post from: SeanPAune.com

World Cup 2010 Comes To A Close

ShareThis

Well, someone pinch me, because someone finally woke FIFA up the need for technology to be used in reffing games.

The other day I wrote about how FIFA, the governing body of world football (soccer), needed to stop playing around and get serious about using technology as an aid in reffing games.  After the disastrous judging of two goals on Sunday in the Germany Vs. England and Brazil Vs. Mexico games, it was overwhelmingly obvious that something had to be done, and apparently FIFA agrees.

According to The Wall Street Journal, FIFA president Sepp Blatter apologized to both England and Mexico over the blown calls, and commented that it would be “a nonsense” for the governing body to not reopen its research into technology that could be used to avoid these situations.  ”After having witnessed such a situation,” Mr. Blatter said in reference to the non-goal kick by England. “we have to open again this file, definitely.”

The governing body is scheduled to have a meeting in July where the subject will once again be addressed.

This has to happen.  England lost a clear goal and Brazil’s first goal was a clear case of being offsides.  We at home could see both situations clear as day, but for whatever reason the refs on the field could not.  Both situations could have changed the course of their respective games, but, alas, they didn’t.

Welcome to the 21st century FIFA, glad to have ya.

Post from: SeanPAune.com

FIFA To Consider Using Video Technology

ShareThis

FIFA needs to enter the late 20th century.

No, that wasn’t a typo, FIFA, the ruling body for football (soccer) is going to walk away with egg all over its face after what happened on Sunday at the World Cup. Forget the vuvazelas annoying the heck out of everyone, it is the staunch stance against the use of instant reply technology that will forever mark this year’s World Cup.

The Germany Vs. England match was severely marred by a line judge not seeing the ball cross the line into Germany’s goal and would have brought the game up to 2-2.  Everyone else in the world seems to have seen it, but because it bounced back out so fast he missed it and disallowed the goal.  Take a look at this image over at MSNBC, and you try to tell me that ball wasn’t inside the goal line.  Even German coach Joachim Loew said,  ”I saw in the television this ball was behind the line, it must have been given as goal.”

Okay, fine, perfect example of how instant replay could, and should, be used in football, but certainly things like that happen so rarely you can live without it!

… aw, crap.

Argentina Vs. Mexico … later the very same day.  Argentina scores its first goal with its player clearly offsides to just about everyone but a blind man.  Somehow the officials missed it, they allowed the goal, and Argentina was on its way to victory.

Look, there is no way that instant replay can be used in every case, no one argues that, but in the case of a disputed goal, it has to be used.  England deserved to lose (the final was 4-1 Germany), but how differently would they have played the second half had they gone into it 2-2?  My thoughts are that Germany would have still won, but we’ll never know the true outcome of the game because for some insane reason FIFA says that technology should not be involved in the game.

So, with that in mind …

• Why is there lighting for night games?
• Why is there artificial grass woven into some of the fields?
• Why does the main official wear a headset?
• Why are electronic boards used on the sidelines to communicate substitutions and stoppage time?

I could go on, but you get the point.

Again, instant replay can not be used in every single instance as it would ruin the flow of the match, but when it comes to a disputed goal, it must be introduced.

Post from: SeanPAune.com

The Time For Instant Reply In FIFA Is Now

ShareThis

The World Cup Group Stage is over, and now it’s on to the serious stuff … the Group of 16.

I wanted to get this out before the first game so I could at least look like I know what I’m talking about. With the 2006 final two (Italy and France) already out of the picture, it’s anyone’s guess what is going to happen. There are some easy picks in this round, such as Germany will take down England, Paraguay will dominate Japan (although the Japanese are looking unusually strong) and Mexico will probably be out. There is no way I can pick all eight games, but boy are these going to be some exciting matches.

All times are Eastern USA time.

Round of 16 Schedule

• Uruguay vs. South Korea – June 26 10:00 EDT
• USA vs. Ghana – June 26 14:30 EDT
• Germany vs. England – June 27 10:00 EDT
• Argentina vs. Mexico – June 27 14:30 EDT
• Netherland vs. Slovakia – June 28 10:00 EDT
• Brazil vs. Chile – June 28 14:30 EDT
• Paraguay vs. Japan – June 29 10:00 EDT
• Spain vs. Portugal – June 29 14:30 EDT

Who are some of your picks?

Post from: SeanPAune.com

World Cup 2010 Group Of 16

ShareThis

France is out of the World Cup, and to that, I say good riddance.

I still have not forgotten that France got into this World Cup off of a handball last year against Ireland, eliminating that country’s hopes of getting into the tournament. The team even admitted the handball after the game, but by then nothing could be done.

Since the team’s arrival in South Africa they have acted like brats, and in a expletive filled tirade against the team coach after a loss to Mexico, team captain Nicolas Anelka was sent home early.  The team then mutinied on Sunday, refusing to practice, and walked off the field.  According to Martin Rogers at Yahoo! Sports, Nicolas Sarkozy, the president of France, sent his minister of sports to South Africa to try to get the team ready for the game against South Africa, but only after he had publicly blasted the team.

France lost against South Africa today in a 2-to-1 loss, and apparently there was a bus awaiting them outside the stadium to take them directly to the airport to be flown home in coach class.  This is contrast to them arriving in South Africa after having been flown there first class.  Pretty much what they deserved if you ask me.

In 2006 France lost to Italy for the championship, but not until after famed French player Zidane opted to blatantly head-butt an Italian player.  It almost makes you wonder if this country should even be allowed to qualify any more.

Wait … yes, they should.  How else will have a team to point at and go, “See them?  Don’t act like them.”

Post from: SeanPAune.com

France Says Good-Bye To The World Cup

ShareThis

Could someone explain to me what is happening with the “big gun” nations in the World Cup?

I am far from an expert on football, but it feels like this World Cup is going to end up being a battle of the small nations. The traditional big gun nations (such as Spain, Italy etc) are not having a good tournament.  In the Group of 32 you get 3 points for a win, 1 for a tie and 0 for a loss.  Lets take a look at some of the Big Guns:

• France, which made it to the finals in 2006 is currently in danger of not getting to the Group of 16.  They have one game left to play, and currently stand at 1 point in Group A, Which Uruguay and Mexico are tied for the lead at 4 points each.
• United States and England are tied at 2 points each for second place in Group C, with Slovenia leading with 4 points.  In theory we both could make it to the Group of 16, but it’s going to take some work with only one game each left.
• The Netherlands has 6 points in Group E, and is the only country guaranteed to make it out of the Group of 32 thus far.
• Spain, the favorites to win the cup lost their first game in Group H and stand at 0 points.  They have yet to play their second game, but they lost to Switzerland … no one saw that coming.

What prompted this post was that Italy, the current World Cup champions, currently have 2 points with one game to go.  Today they tied New Zealand in a 1-to-1 match.  The odds of New Zealand winning were 15-to-1, and the odds of a tie were 5-to-1.

… What in the world is going on?

I have absolutely no problem with the concept of smaller countries getting the attention, or even winning, but thus far this year’s tournament has just been more of a jaw-dropping, “What in the world is happening?!?” kind of feeling.  I almost get the feeling that several of the countries came in with inflated attitudes.  Very much of a, “Well, we’re so-and-so, and we’re just going to walk into the Group of 16, and … oh, hey, how’d you get the ball in our net?”

The big guns have got to get their acts together and fast or it is going to be a very interesting final two come July 11th.

As a side note, don’t get me started on Koman Coulibaly, the referee in the USA vs. Slovenia match where we tied and were robbed of a goal … apparently FIFA will make a ruling on him Monday, but it won’t change the outcome of the game.

Post from: SeanPAune.com

What In The World Is Happening To The World Cup Big Guns?

ShareThis

It’s hard to believe, but we are already a week into the 2010 World Cup, but it’s a week a lot of teams will never forget.

Up until the beginning of the tournament, everyone was walking around saying Spain had this cup in the bag.  Apparently Switzerland had very different ideas about this and beat the favorites 1 to 0 on the 16th.  They are next up against Honduras, which they will more than likely defeat, but boy that Switzerland loss had to sting.

As we progress into the second set of round 1 games, and the second week of the tournament, so far it looks like we’ve learned that you just can’t predict how this game will go.  Did anyone expect Mexico to defeat France, a country that went to the final two in 2006, today?  No, not really.  Not only did they beat them, but it was 2 to 0, and France looked completely lost.  At this point it isn’t a given France will get into the round of 16.

No one can predict how the World Cup will go, and this year is teaching that lesson in a big way.

Post from: SeanPAune.com

World Cup 2010 – Week 1

ShareThis